Exploitation of Children in California

http://www.gndzerosrv.com/Web%20Pages/016GZS - Exploitation of Children in California.html

Jim Untershine, GZS of LB, 01-04-02

California led the nation in 1999 making a $307 million dollar profit by driving custodial parents to Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) 1/. California led the nation in 1998 making $189 million dollar profit chasing non-custodial parents (NCP) away from Child Support Enforcement (CSE) 2/. California led the nation in 1998 establishing 34,539 paternities over and above out-of-wedlock births and represents a paternity establishment percentage of 105% (cumulative total from years 1995 - 1998) 3/. This implies that there exist fraudulent or redundant accounts, or paternities are being established for children in other states, or paternities are being established for children born in wedlock, but not from the husband.

Policy Studies Inc.(PSI) recently conducted the review of California's child support guideline for the Judicial Branch while investigating the fraudulent accounting practices of LA County DCSS for the Executive Branch. PSI aspires to "Do socially useful work, have fun, and make money". PSI is committed to "Creating an environment that allows employees to take risks without being punished for mistakes" 4/. PSI has provided child support consultation to 49 states, Canada, and Australia advising them that a child support guideline that is affordable will make CSE and welfare (TANF) unprofitable.

The Institute for Family and Social Responsibility (FASR) is being paid by the taxpayers to deceive our legislature regarding the outrageous guidelines that exists in our nation 5/. This clearinghouse for child support enforcement statistics is insuring that our Congressmen will never understand why California makes the large coin while other states are losing their shirt. California leads the nation in the amounts demanded from non-custodial parents demanding 25% of their net income for one child, 40% for two, and 50% for three. FASR has reported that California demands only 18% of the NCP's net income for two children and that Indiana led the nation demanding 20%. FASR is based out of Indiana University at Bloomington (IUB).

On 12/20/01 I received a notice from Los Angeles County Bureau of Family Support Operations entitled "Child Support Consumer Credit Report Notification" stating that I owe $233,957 in back child support. On 11/14/01 the Los Angeles County District Attorney informed me that I owed $170,361. I received a 60-day jail sentence that was stayed until 03/14/02. I can stay out of jail if I get a financial review, work 10 hours of graffiti removal, and pay something. Los Angeles County and Monterey County are billing me for the same children using different amounts. I have refused to go to civil court to get a review because LA County refused to recognize a default civil court order that lowered the amount I was ordered to pay. The reason why NCPs don't appear in default court trials is because they are rarely invited (I wasn't).

$233,957 is being reported to consumer credit because LA County is combining the back child support from LA County and Monterey County. I should owe $108,498 in back child support. LA County shows that I owe $141,439 in back child support and $28,912 in interest, while Monterey shows that I owe $45,257 in back child support and $5,604 in interest.

On 09/15/99 I made this fraud abundantly clear to the LA County Public Defenders Office, who has assured me that the LA County District Attorney is fully aware of this fraud. On 01/06/01 I complained to the California Department of Justice who referred me to DCSS stating "Enforcement of State law is the primary authority of local enforcement agencies, and the Attorney General's role is to insure that laws are uniformly enforced statewide". On 07/04/01 I submitted a proposal to the House Ways and Means Committee detailing this fraud and suggested legislative changes to stop the exploitation of children for money and the persecution of heterosexual taxpayers that dare to have sex with women.

Los Angeles County has ignored civil court orders, criminal court orders, filings for enforcement in other counties, ignored $32,000 paid directly to the custodial parent through a QDRO, have incarcerated me for 34 days before allowing me to enter a "not guilty" plea regarding these charges. The LA County District Attorney and DCSS operate with impunity in the persecution of the only parents capable of providing support for their children. They do it in the name of our children.

"Family Law is a system. That system is our enemy. When you're inside, what do you see? Businessmen, Teachers, Lawyers, Carpenters, the very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system, and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged, and many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it." 6/

1/ US House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means GREEN BOOK Table 7-17
2/ US House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means GREEN BOOK Table 8-23
3/ US House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means GREEN BOOK Table 8-20, 8-21, 8-22
4/ http://www.policy-studies.com
5/ US House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means GREEN BOOK Table 8-2
6/ "THE MATRIX" ("The Matrix" reading between the lines)

Jim Untershine, 824 E Pass Rd #3, Gulfport, MS 39507, gzs@gndzerosrv.com, www.gndzerosrv.com

Jim Untershine holds a BSEE from Mississippi State University and has 13 years experience in feedback control system design. Mr. Untershine is currently using the teachings of Werner Heisenberg and Henry David Thoreau to expose Family Law in California as the exploitation of children for money and the indentured servitude of heterosexual taxpayers who dare to raise children in this country.