Another Shot Heard Around The World

Non-custodial representatives who advocate change in child support guidelines will not be appointed - Another Shot Heard Around The World.html

Jim Untershine, GZS of MS, 07-30-01

Cover-up is defined as an effort or strategy of concealment, especially a planned effort to prevent something potentially scandalous from becoming public.

Legislators are urged to take an active interest in child support guideline reviews conducted in their respective states. The motive behind the Secretary of Virginia, to eliminate an appointed representative of non-custodial parents in the review of their state's child support guideline, may expose a clear and present danger to the rights granted to heterosexual taxpayers by a federal mandate.

The Legislative branch of many states are being mislead by what they may think is a well represented and comprehensive review the child support guideline in their state. In reality, the Legislature is being presented with the findings of independent entities with regard to the success of family law courts in their state to impose the child support guideline on non-custodial parents.

In California, the same independent entity (Policy Studies Inc.) that is conducting the states child support guideline review for the Judicial Council (Judicial branch) is the same entity investigating the child support enforcement agency (Executive branch) regarding fraudulent accounting practices. This independent entity has led the state of California by the nose in their implementation of their present guideline and are now covering up the ongoing fraud in the state's effort to enforce it.

Driving the only parent capable of financially supporting the children into financial insolvency guarantees the state federal funding. This is not what the federal government had in mind when they allowed each state to practice family law. The review of each state's child support guideline is supposed to insure the state's compliance with the federal mandate as well as assessing the effects on the children and parents exposed to the guideline.

Dr Baskerville is being punished for pointing out the obvious, and being made an example of for expressing his outrage. This is not only admired, but expected, as a concerned representative for non-custodial parents and children. His views are shared by many and should be addressed as part of the review, not disregarded as if he is not allowed to participate.

Silencing or eliminating all advocates for change
amongst those who advise legislation
turns objective review into law prearranged
and signals the fall of a nation.


Jim Untershine, 824 E Pass Rd #3, Gulfport, MS 39507,,

Jim Untershine holds a BSEE from Mississippi State University and has 13 years experience in feedback control system design. Mr. Untershine is currently using the teachings of Werner Heisenberg and Henry David Thoreau to expose Family Law in California as the exploitation of children for money and the indentured servitude of heterosexual taxpayers who dare to raise children in this country.